Explain Essay example -- Drama

Explain Explain the importance of the Magic If and Given Circumstances to Stanislavski’s psycho technique. Refer to any practical examples that will help explain this. MR GROGAN H/W In this essay I will be explaining the work we have been doing recently during this term and the relevance to our study of Stanislavski’s psycho technique. I will be outlining how his ideas of the ‘Magic If’ and ‘Given Circumstances’ contribute to the importance of this technique. Stanislavski had several ideas about how to achieve a sense of inner and outer truth in terms of his character, one being the magic if. If is a word which can transform our thoughts; through it we can imagine ourselves in virtually any situation. "If I suddenly became wealthy..." "If I were vacationing on the Caribbean Island..." "If I had great talent..." "If that person who insulted me comes near me again..." The word ‘if’ becomes a powerful lever for the mind; it has the ability to lift us out of ourselves a give us a sense of absolute certainty about imaginary circumstances. The answer to these simple questions can be a springboard to creativity and inspiration, because it allows the actor to realize the fact that, he is living out a fictional life, a figment of the writers imagination, with sets and props that are not real life homes and settings. When we first look at the ‘Magic If’, Stanislavski makes us aware that a performing actor must logically justify his actions in consistency with real life. Therefore he must act under his passions in character and not play with them, acting internally and externally with complete rationalization. By using the "Magic If" the actor is granting himself permission to "believe" in these imaginary objects, it allows the actor to transfer himself from the world of reality to the world in which dreative work can me done. Based on the idea of ‘The Magic If’ we used this idea to draw from our own experiences and imagination to get into character for a recent speech, that each of us had been given to learn. To get into my character, Puck from ‘A Midsummer Night’s Dream’, I used the idea of the ‘Magic If’ to arouse my imagination, consequently entering the soul of my character, allowing myself o from a creative belief within their mind's eye. Through asking myself questions, presenting myself with possible obstacles and... ... tree, describing in detail exactly what he saw. What was happening? This allowed the actor to awaken the senses, to be made aware of the circumstances he was in, the smell, the sights, the weather, and therefore open up the imagination to set the circumstances and reasons behind why the story is happening for example why they are having a picnic- because it is a hot day etc. The actor can imagine and convey to Stanislavski his account (as an oak tree) uninterrupted series of visual images, maintaining the idea of artistic stage reality though. The ‘given circumstances’ and ‘magic if’ of the psycho-technique inspire actors; they bring out emotions whilst training their artistic sense of belief. Both make them aware and surround them with the world created by the writer or director. It also provides imagination and the ability to explore the world with the ability to understand the reasons for the ‘given circumstances’. The ‘given circumstances’ are the set of boundaries you are given as an actor, the ‘magic if’ helping you develop an understanding for the role you are playing and maintain it, both inspiring the justified imagination and spirit of the character.

Analyse the causes of the 1848 revolution in France Essay

Analyse the causes of the 1848 revolution in France. With the ascension of Louis-Phillipe to the throne in July 1830, after the abdication of Charles X he appeared to have many factors in his favour that would seem to warrant a successful monarch and long standing regime. However, after 14 years the monarch, Louis-Phillipe, felt forced into a position where he had to abdicate, why then did the regime collapse so suddenly and unexpectedly? Especially after it had overcome so many early difficulties to establish itself in the minds of the French as an acceptable form of government. I believe the answer lies in a number of factor/causes. Long Term Causes Notably, one of the greatest weaknesses of the monarchy was the fact that Louis-Phillipe could claim no right to the throne of France. The French Tradition concerning the crown was that of heredity right, and had occurred so for centuries, being based, it was claimed, on the will of God. Therefore, although disliked no one could dispute the right of the Bourbons to occupy the throne of France. Louis-Phillipe had no such divine right as there was no belief that the legitimate monarch should be replaced by one of his relatives if he became unpopular. On what basis, then, was he king? There only appear to be three basis’s for a regime; hereditary right, the will of the people or the force of arms. Louis-Phillipe fulfilled none of these criteria. Indeed, the Orleaninst Monarchy was merely a useful compromise clutched at by desperate land owners who feared for their welfare in context of the future. The only way such forms of government can survive is if they manage to continue con vincing their nation that they have the moral right to be in power and in so doing inspire confidence in their supporters. Other long-term causes of Louis-Phillipe eventual downfall can be traced to his policies, both foreign and domestic. What must be remembered is that for the previous five hundred years France had been the most powerful nation in Europe, a heroic and glorious past in which the French placed great importance in. This had ended with napoleons defeat at the hands of the fourth coalition of European powers who had felt that their safety had been placed in question. This, napoleons final defeat, had occurred fifteen years previous and sufficient time had lapsed for the French people to yearn a return to their glorious past and a reinstatement of their empire. However, Louis-Phillipe thought differently, ignoring his past (as a young man he was a refugee abroad which led him to view active/aggressive foreign policy with suspicion) and his natural caution and desire for peace, one has to take into account the fact that the other major European Powers were determined not to let France endanger the security of the other European states again. The king realized that it was likely that any provocation the Powers would attempt to impose their will upon France as they had done in 1815. He recognised the precarious position he was in therefore his highest priority was to avoid a general European war where he was sure to be opposed by Austria, Russia, Prussia and Britain. Evidence of this opinion came in the form of the Belgium question. Belgium previously of the French empire had been annexed to the Netherlands in an attempt to create a buffer to future French expansion. The Belgium’s were not happy with this situation and so rebelled. They were successful. There was general fear throughout Europe that France would then again annex Belgium, but this did not happen. France did not intervene even though Louis-Phillipe’s son was offered the crown. Instead, France worked closely with Britain to ensure the independence of Belgium. Later in Spain there was a power struggle, an area considered to be Frances sphere of influence, but again Louis-Phillipe tried to gain no unfair advantage in the area. This behaviour of the French king was abnormal in the eyes of the French and wholly disappointing as again and again he refused to gain international advantage. In the late 1830’s a foreign crisis emerged that would make the French people feel more than disappointment. The Ottoman Empire was an empire that was struggling. The only way it managed to maintain its control was by establishing local rulers who had relative freedom as long as they respected the suzerainty of the Sultan in Constantinople. However, one leader emerged, Mehemet Ali of Egypt that had almost as much power as the Sultan himself. This pleased the French as Ali was a client of theirs using a lot of their technology and intelligence. The European powers were displease with this and wanted to limit Ali’s powers. Thiers, the leading minister, began an obstructionist policy hoping that Ali would resolve matters in his own way, Thiers even implied it would be an issue that France would go to was over. Unfortunately Britain called Frances bluff as Britain and Russia forced Ali to accept their terms. Louis-Phillipe was humiliated as he wasn’t prepared to risk a war with Britain and Russia; he dismissed Thiers and had to accept national humiliation. This specific incident led to enormous displeasure and discontent among the French people. They felt that in backing down Louis-Phillipe had acted dishonourably and had humiliated the country. Furthermore, the subsequent friendship that evolved with Britain (a situation which Louis-Phillipe felt would be favourable to his position in Europe) added more salt to the wounds. France was playing a junior partner to Britain, the traditional enemy. Louis-Phillipe was in a position where he could do no right. He wasn’t in the position to adopt an aggressive foreign policy (that is aside from the fact that he didn’t want to) which disappointed his subjects and in the scenario where he did become active he adopted positions tha t led to even more humiliation than inactivity would have bestowed. Another aspect of Louis-Phillipe’s reign that could of led to his downfall can be rooted in his domestic policy. Again here inactivity was favoured by the king. Once the regime was established and certain basic rules changed to the kings liking the king’s view was that everything was working well so there was no use in tampering with it. Almost, that the system was beyond improvement. Unfortunately for the king, this was not a widely shared view. The main bone of discontent was concerning the current voting system. Many hankered for a reform especially as there was emerging a new class, a group of men who considered themselves to be part of the social elite and yet who didn’t have the right to vote. Their cause was championed by the Legislative assembly (with Thiers an ardent supporter) a situation which made life more difficult for the king and his government. Another reason for the eventual collapse of the July monarchy can be traced back to the actual person of the king. By 1843 the king had reached his 70th birthday and although fit and alert he was, decidedly old and traits that he had exhibited earlier on in life became more pronounced. His talkativeness became something to be endured, he avoided making decisions altogether being satisfied with the current situation, His public appearances became less which meant he couldn’t create and maintain personal loyalties, significantly he stopped reviewing the National Guard in 1840, what Louis-Phillipe couldn’t see was that he was leaving a vacuum that could easily be filled be someone else on the occasion of a crisis. However these weren’t his only problems for the king one of his other problems was that he failed to play the part of the grand and great king that was traditional in France. He dull and boring, to be honest, he lived like a bourgeoisie merchant doing much for himself, wandering through Paris unattended; he was not the inaccessible monarch of previously. He looked and dressed in an undistinguished manner. This led to the claim that the king was insufficiently different from the ordinary man to be worth having as king. Short Term Causes One of the major problems that surrounded the Revolution of 1848 was the current economic depression. Due to Industrial Revolution Paris had grown considerably which, even when the economy was healthy, created problems of poverty and poor living conditions. By 1846 there was widespread unemployment; tens of thousands of people were living in poverty or near starving. Also, around the same time a social conscience had begun to develop among the upper classes and the opinion was that something must be done. The king responded with his usual stoicism and stubbornness in that he felt that nothing could be done. This isolated some of his natural supporters and disillusioned those who thought that the July monarchy would be a flexible and responsive regime. There were many opponents of Guizot in Parliament, many of whom wanted to see him ousted form power. (NB. They wanted to achieve power for themselves not overthrow the king) One way which the felt effective was the organization of banquets to champion the cause of electoral reform. They arranged a series of local meeting to whip up popular support. Instead the reformers lost control as they were taken over by extreme republicans who desired the overthrowing of the regime. Consequently the meeting were banned and made illegal. There was one due to take place in Paris on 22 February 1848 but subsequently it was illegal. A march took its place. When Louis-Phillipe then called on the National Guard he recognized their reluctance and realized he judged the general mood wrongly. He lost his nerve. He dismissed Guizot in order to mollify the opposition but this instead gave hope to the agitators. The next day troops then fired on a good natured crowd killing 80. The Republicans used this to whip up anger and mobilize a mob in Paris. On 24 February 1848 Louis-Phillipe abdicated. In a situation as complex as that of the Revolution of 1848 with so many interdependent causes it is foolish to attempt to satisfy such a wide ranging issue with one simple answer. There was a fundamental weakness in the July Monarchy in that it seemed to have no right to the throne what was unfortunate for Louis-Phillipe was that there were already alternative forms of government available if the current one became unpopular. Furthermore, his changing personality was leaving a vacuum that could easily be filled be someone else on the occasion of a crisis. These both led to the king’s support being considerable diminished at a time when it was most need. Moreover The king’s lifestyle contributed to the widespread feeling that the July monarchy had outlived its usefulness: it was not that Louis-Phillipe’s lifestyle and personality turned friends into enemies; rather, they contributed to the slump n moral which left the way open to those who passionately wanted change. As well as this his both unsuccessful domestic and foreign led to a more hostile general feeling towards the king as well as contributing to the internal upheaval that eventually led to the kings unseating. In the immediate events leading to the king’s abdication Louis-Phillipe’s â€Å"senile imbecility† (A. de Tocqueville) had a large part to play. His loss of nerve lost many of his last supporters, he failed to stand firm and weather a modest storm. His handling of the situation and especially his failure to call the army which might well have saved him eventually led to his downfall. He allowed a small molehill to become a mountain for no strong reason. It is difficult to assess which of these factors played the greatest role, for, all of the long term factors appear of equal importance, on a par also with the backdrop of economic depression and social consciousness that was concurrent at the time however the questions still remains whether these on their own would have been enough to make a successful revolution and if whether the king had acted correctly and strongly, he would not have fallen It seems it was the kings inactivity that pervaded every part of his professional and personal life (foreign and domestic policy, personality and lifestyle and ultimately in the last days leading up to his abdication) that eventually l ed to his downfall. (Felt that this wasn’t a satisfactory conclusion, found it hard to articulate here, how could I improve it, there seemed to be so many possibilities) Use ready made alternative forms of govment in conclusion to show why fist point was important. Domestic policy – if their had been an electorate reform the regime would have won the cative support of the ‘new group’ Personality- he was lifestyle- they Hort term- Louis-Phillipes lack of stubbornessdismayed his supporters who say this as an indication that the end was near and nobody wants to support a lost acuse . Louis-Phillipe was still in the position to use the army and stand strong but the lack of support shown by the National Guard seemed to have b

Decision Making Style - 621 Words

1. What are your highest and lowest rated styles? My highest style for decision-making is Directive, where I have low tolerance for ambiguity but I am efficient, rational, and logical in the way I think. I am focused on short term and quick to make decisions with minimal information and not carefully analyzing other alternatives. My lowest style would be behavioral, where someone with this style will work well with others, are open to suggestions, and are concerned about the achievements of their team. They generally try to avoid conflict and place importance on their acceptance by others. Which as me I do not care really to be accepted by others, I want my work done fast and right the first time. I have always been told â€Å"Why do anything†¦show more content†¦I personally had to make a quick decision to take a game system out of lay-a-way from the back to make her happy, since out number one rule and main rule that matters is â€Å"Make the Customer HAPPY†. Another way I am a directive decision maker is by that at my other job at The Big E in Gaffney, SC I have to make quick and rational decisions on how a birthday party flow is going. The last time we had a birthday party that we had a problem was when a new employee wrote down the date for a birthday party for a date that was not open for parties due to that was the day we had a bowling completion, which this is a problem since for a birthday party they pay for a private event in the bowling alley area and the play gym area along with so many dollars in electronic games on the game floor. Where at this time they came in to get set up and they were denied access to the bowling alley. Which of course this was the day that I was off and had to be called in to fix this problem. When I got the call I just let them know that they could start in the private party room and play gym area and I would be there soon. When I got there I had a whole openShow MoreRelatedDecision Making Styles And Their Associations With Decisions Making Competencies A nd Mental Health1045 Words   |  5 PagesSource: BavoÄ ¾Ãƒ ¡r, Jozef and OÄ ¾ga Orosovà ¡. â€Å"Decision-making styles and their associations with decision-making competencies and mental health.† Judgment and Decision Making 10(2015): 115-122. Web. 1 Jan. 2015 Problem: The issue that is being addressed is finding out what the relationship are between the different decision-making styles and how this affects our decision-making competencies and mental heath. Hypothesis: If you use certain decision-making styles then it will affect the outcome of yourRead MoreDecision-Making Style Summary. Snehapriya Bharatha. Mba1167 Words   |  5 Pages Decision-making Style Summary Snehapriya Bharatha MBA 505: Foundations of Management Dr. Frear January, 23, 2017 Decision-making Style Summary: Detailed understanding of the identified problems and collaborative determination of the solution is decision-making. Successful accomplishment of this task requires applying multiple steps which assist individuals to make exceptional decisions. One’s decision-making model might be different than others because there are four known decision-makingRead MoreFamily Communication Patterns : Mothers And Fathers Communication Style And Children s Influence On Family Decision Making850 Words   |  4 PagesPatterns: Mothers and Fathers Communication Style and Children s Perceived Influence in Family Decision Making. Journal of International Consumer Marketing. 19 (2), 75-95 Belch, G. E., Belch, M. A., Ceresino, G. (1985) Parental and teenage child influences in family decision making. Journal of Business Research, 13(2), 163-176. Blichfeldt, B. S., Pedersen, B. M., Johansen, A., Hansen, L. (2010) Tweens Tourists: Children and Decision-Making. Journal of Tourism Consumption and Practice, 2(1)Read MoreWork Style Survey On Decision Making Essay1453 Words   |  6 PagesWORK-STYLE SURVEY Part 1: Participant Demography 1) Please tell us the overview of the company and types of project you were involved in 2) What was your role in the projects? 3) How long have you been working in this position? 4) How many important decisions have you made? 5) How important was the decision affect on the company? 6) How many different decisions have you came up with? 7) Have you studied or worked overseas? How long? Part 2: Cultural Aspects on Decision Making 1) PleaseRead MoreThe Role Of Leadership Style On Ethical Decision Making1081 Words   |  5 Pageswill analyze the influence of leadership style on ethical decision-making. To discuss and understand leadership style, we have several options. One is to classify it, as do most research studies on leadership. We can do that by using labels, autocratic, democratic, laissez-faire, and others. There are characterizations such as the craftsman, the jungle fighter, the company man, and the gamesman. We also can place leadership style on axes: a person oriented versus productionRead MoreWhat Are Kfc Decision Making Style of Manager5132 Words   |  21 Pagescountries, and the largest 100 of them control about 40 percent of world trade. TRANSNATIONAL Transnational companies are much more complex organizations. They have invested in foreign operations, have a central corporate facility but give decision-making, Ramp;D and marketing powers to each individual foreign market. INTERNATIONAL nternational companies are importers and exporters, they have no investment outside of their home country. WHAT TYPE OF GIANT Trade now began to evolve into internationalRead MoreConsumer Decision-Making Styles of Gen Y Consumers in Malaysia2390 Words   |  10 PagesConsumer Decision-Making Styles of Gen Y Consumers in Malaysia Introduction Market segmentation is a crucial element in marketing because goods can no longer be produced and sold without considering consumer needs and recognizing the characteristic of those needs. Due to the highly competitive environment nowadays, attracting and retaining enough loyal customers plays an important key role when developing business strategies. Therefore, business should understand and target consumer from differentRead MoreLeadership Styles and Decision Making Abilities: Extracting the Best Performance in Coffee Shops599 Words   |  2 Pagesleadership styles that can help to extract the best performance in the coffee shops. Before making the choice the situation must be understood. The coffee is going to be great, the atmosphere comfortable and the Wifi strong, but to engage customers and foster a client with repeat business is going to require a strong customer service orientation, and it is the need for exceptional customer service that is going to determine how the shop s are to be run. There are two main approaches to decision-makingRead MoreLeadership Sat Task 1 Essay1729 Words   |  7 Pages- SAT TASK 1 A1. LEADERSHIP STYLE Leadership is the ability to organize a group of people in order to achieve a common goal. My leadership style is participative leadership and it is to share decision making with each member of my group. A Participative style of leadership encompasses consultative, consensus, and democratic. As a participative leader who is consultative, it is very important that I confer with members of the group before making final decisions on issues concerning the group.Read MoreLeaders Based On Leading Individuals1307 Words   |  6 PagesLeadership Style Some researchers address leaders based on leading individuals, some according to leading a team, while others focus only on specific leadership theories practiced in an organizational environment (Yukl, 2012). Leadership processes and practices have an impact (positively or negatively) on the work habits and performance of individuals, teams, and an organization as a whole. According to Mà ¦trà ®x (n.d.a), an individual’s ability to effectively lead can be grouped into three major categories;